commit 9584ef23ab6a5e87357f8af4117243d9558760d4
author Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin@sysmocom.de> Mon Jun 12 14:21:28 2023 +0200
committer pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de> Wed Jun 14 09:10:26 2023 +0000
tree 30377bbd10dbdd8d092961a60bd7126bf1e0ecb1
parent a56058e9ea85a4779bb26365ba5c225f6becef22

pcu: Rework test TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req_n3105_max to base it on T3168

N3105 is used for DL TBFs only (as tested by TC_n3105_max_t3195). The
test TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req_n3105_max is hence
wrongly written and should be based on T3168. Since recently, osmo-pcu
also moved to using T3168 in the scenario triggered by this test, hence
move to using it.

Related: osmo-pcu.git Change-Id I87dff68dedd06b60501e7586d20faf02bb1f0c93
Change-Id: Ibdfa9879cc56f5e2090cee0d3d70ee5df7c90454

pcu/expected-results.xml

diff --git a/pcu/expected-results.xml b/pcu/expected-results.xml
index 1f953aa..cdc4aec 100644
--- a/pcu/expected-results.xml
+++ b/pcu/expected-results.xml
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
   <testcase classname='PCU_Tests' name='TC_dl_multislot_tbf_ms_class_from_2phase' time='MASKED'/>
   <testcase classname='PCU_Tests' name='TC_ul_multislot_tbf_ms_class_from_2phase' time='MASKED'/>
   <testcase classname='PCU_Tests' name='TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req' time='MASKED'/>
-  <testcase classname='PCU_Tests' name='TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req_n3105_max' time='MASKED'/>
+  <testcase classname='PCU_Tests' name='TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req_t3168' time='MASKED'/>
   <testcase classname='PCU_Tests' name='TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_dl_ack_nack' time='MASKED'/>
   <testcase classname='PCU_Tests' name='TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_dl_ack_nack_egprs' time='MASKED'/>
   <testcase classname='PCU_Tests' name='TC_multiplex_dl_gprs_egprs' time='MASKED'/>