bsc: TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_noreply: use f_expect_chan_rel
Instead of placing an own set of channel release expectations, just use the
common f_expect_chan_rel() that exists for exactly this purpose.
This will also be in line with upcoming changes to tighten checking of the
lchan release messages.
Related: OS#3413
Change-Id: Ib7dd886472337e2deb968e6f9de6cecdb7855319
diff --git a/bsc/BSC_Tests.ttcn b/bsc/BSC_Tests.ttcn
index 551ffe0..a2a3378 100644
--- a/bsc/BSC_Tests.ttcn
+++ b/bsc/BSC_Tests.ttcn
@@ -429,15 +429,7 @@
/* expect BSC to disable the channel again if there's no response from MSC */
/* MS waits 20s (T3210) at LU; 10s (T3230) at CM SERV REQ and 5s (T3220) AT detach */
- IPA_RSL[0].clear;
- alt {
- [] IPA_RSL[0].receive(tr_ASP_RSL_UD(sid, tr_RSL_MsgTypeD(RSL_MT_RF_CHAN_REL))) -> value rx_rsl_ud { }
- [] IPA_RSL[0].receive(tr_ASP_RSL_UD(sid, tr_RSL_REL_REQ(chan_nr, ?))) -> value rx_rsl_ud {
- f_ipa_tx(0, ts_RSL_REL_CONF(chan_nr, main_dcch));
- repeat;
- }
- }
-
+ f_expect_chan_rel(0, chan_nr);
setverdict(pass);
}