SMPP: convert a SMMA to a SMPP ALERT NOTIFICATION
diff --git a/openbsc/src/libmsc/smpp_openbsc.c b/openbsc/src/libmsc/smpp_openbsc.c
index eb1ac11..0bc85e5 100644
--- a/openbsc/src/libmsc/smpp_openbsc.c
+++ b/openbsc/src/libmsc/smpp_openbsc.c
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
#include <openbsc/gsm_04_11.h>
#include <openbsc/gsm_data.h>
#include <openbsc/signal.h>
+#include <openbsc/transaction.h>
+#include <openbsc/gsm_subscriber.h>
#include "smpp_smsc.h"
@@ -250,6 +252,9 @@
{
struct sms_signal_data *sig_sms = signal_data;
struct gsm_sms *sms = sig_sms->sms;
+ struct smsc *smsc = handler_data;
+ struct osmo_esme *esme;
+ struct gsm_subscriber *subscr;
int rc = 0;
if (!sms)
@@ -283,6 +288,29 @@
ESME_ROK, sms->smpp.msg_id);
}
break;
+ case S_SMS_SMMA:
+ if (!sig_sms->trans || !sig_sms->trans->subscr) {
+ /* SMMA without a subscriber? strange... */
+ LOGP(DLSMS, LOGL_NOTICE, "SMMA without subscriber?\n");
+ break;
+ }
+
+ subscr = sig_sms->trans->subscr;
+ /* There's no real 1:1 match for SMMA in SMPP. However,
+ * an ALERT NOTIFICATION seems to be the most logical
+ * choice */
+ llist_for_each_entry(esme, &smsc->esme_list, list) {
+ if (esme->acl && esme->acl->deliver_src_imsi) {
+ smpp_tx_alert(esme, TON_Subscriber_Number,
+ NPI_Land_Mobile_E212,
+ subscr->imsi, 0);
+ } else {
+ smpp_tx_alert(esme, TON_Network_Specific,
+ NPI_ISDN_E163_E164,
+ subscr->extension, 0);
+ }
+ }
+ break;
}
return rc;