tbf: Avoid keeping poll nodes in pdch_ulc of temporary control_ts used during PACCH assignment

When MS sends us the Packet Resource Request as RRBP from final UL ACK/NACK, we create a new TBF
with a different set of allocated TS. However, we must send the Pkt UL Assignment with information
of the new TBF using that same TS where we receive the Packet Resource Request, which happens to
be the control TS of the previous/old TBF. The original control TS of the new TBF is kept in
tbf->first_common_ts.

Hence the code does gprs_rlcmac_pdch::rcv_resource_request():
"""
ul_tbf->control_ts = ts_no;
"""

And later, when we receive a CTRL ACK answering the Pkt UL Assigment, we change the control TS of
the new TBF back to the new one, by calling tbf_assign_control_ts(), which basically does:
"""
tbf->control_ts = tbf->first_common_ts;
"""

So, for instance we have a TBF which was allocated with tbf->control_ts=4 and hence is only attached
to PDCH 4 (tbf->pdch[]), but for which is temporarily applied tbf->control_ts=7.  Hence, when a poll
is requested, it is done in control_ts, aka 7, which is not in the array of attached PDCH.

The problem is of course if we never reach the point where the final control_ts is set, due to never
receiving the CTRL ACK. If the TBF is freed (due to timer X2001) before receiving the CTRL ACK and
hence tbf_assign_control_ts() is called, a crash may occur, because potentially a poll for the TBF is
left in TS 7 because it's not a PDCH attached to the TBF and hence poll
entries on that TS are not released, hence keeping a pointer to the
freed TBF.

Related: SYS#5647
Change-Id: I0c49f2695e0d932d956c01976c9458eebee63cd4
1 file changed
tree: 70e8f4c1eda66be91354cce2df5f769a186ae84a
  1. contrib/
  2. debian/
  3. doc/
  4. include/
  5. src/
  6. tests/
  7. .gitignore
  8. .gitreview
  9. configure.ac
  10. COPYING
  11. git-version-gen
  12. Makefile.am
  13. osmoappdesc.py
  14. README.md
  15. TODO
  16. TODO-RELEASE
README.md

osmo-pcu - Osmocom Packet Control Unit

This repository contains a C/C++-language implementation of a GPRS Packet Control Unit, as specified by ETSI/3GPP. It is part of the Osmocom Open Source Mobile Communications project.

The Packet Control Unit is terminating the Layer 2 (RLC/MAC) of the GPRS radio interface and adapting it to the Gb Interface (BSSGP+NS Protocol) towards the SGSN.

The PCU interfaces with the physical layer of the radio interface. OsmoPCU is typically used co-located with the BTS, specifically OsmoBTS. For legacy BTSs that run proprietary sotware without an interface to OsmoPCU, you may also co-locate it with the BSC, specifically OsmoBSC

Homepage

The official homepage of the project is https://osmocom.org/projects/osmopcu/wiki/OsmoPCU

GIT Repository

You can clone from the official osmo-pcu.git repository using

git clone git://git.osmocom.org/osmo-pcu.git

There is a cgit interface at http://git.osmocom.org/osmo-pcu/

Documentation

We provide a user manual as well as a vty reference manual

Please note that a lot of the PCU configuration actually happens inside the BSC, which passes this configuration via A-bis OML to the BTS, which then in turn passes it via the PCU socket into OsmoPCU.

Mailing List

Discussions related to osmo-pcu are happening on the osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org mailing list, please see https://lists.osmocom.org/mailman/listinfo/osmocom-net-gprs for subscription options and the list archive.

Please observe the Osmocom Mailing List Rules when posting.

Contributing

Our coding standards are described at https://osmocom.org/projects/cellular-infrastructure/wiki/Coding_standards

We us a gerrit based patch submission/review process for managing contributions. Please see https://osmocom.org/projects/cellular-infrastructure/wiki/Gerrit for more details

The current patch queue for osmo-pcu can be seen at https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/q/project:osmo-pcu+status:open

Current limitations

  • No PFC support
  • No fixed allocation support (was removed from 3GPP Rel >= 5 anyway)
  • No extended dynamic allocation support
  • No unacknowledged mode operation
  • Only single slot assignment on uplink direction
  • No half-duplex class support (only semi-duplex)
  • No TA loop
  • No power loop
  • Multi-BTS support not tested