msc_vlr_tests: revert IMSI parameter and test nr output
Three recently merged commits take the msc_vlr_tests in a wrong direction.
The IMSI is usually encoded in the hex streams. The rationale behind hex
streams is that it is a) easily copied from a wireshark trace and b) exactly
the bytes as sent by an actual phone. It is hard to parameterize the IMSI
because we would have to employ our encoding functions, which I intentionally
want to keep out of the loop here.
The test number should not appear in the normal test output, so that adding a
test or changing their order does not affect expected output for following
tests. The nr is simply for manual invocation, only seen when invoked with -v.
Revert
- "VLR tests: always print test parameters"
b0a4314911140b1599cccfc8171fcdab4cd9bfab.
- "Expand VLR tests"
d5feadeee8dd24f991df2892d6bcf0be8b0cf707.
- "Move IMSI into test parameters"
093300d141c300651954473d73138b72de04d931.
Change-Id: Ie1b49237746751021da88f6f07bbb9f780d077c9
diff --git a/tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph.c b/tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph.c
index 541bac1..42e620a 100644
--- a/tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph.c
+++ b/tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph.c
@@ -23,11 +23,12 @@
#include "msc_vlr_tests.h"
-void test_ciph(uint8_t nr, const char *imsi)
+void test_ciph()
{
struct vlr_subscr *vsub;
+ const char *imsi = "901700000004620";
- comment_start(nr, imsi);
+ comment_start();
/* implicit: net->authentication_required = true; */
net->a5_encryption_mask = (1 << 1);
@@ -231,14 +232,15 @@
EXPECT_CONN_COUNT(0);
clear_vlr();
- comment_end(nr, imsi);
+ comment_end();
}
-void test_ciph_tmsi(uint8_t nr, const char *imsi)
+void test_ciph_tmsi()
{
struct vlr_subscr *vsub;
+ const char *imsi = "901700000004620";
- comment_start(nr, imsi);
+ comment_start();
/* implicit: net->authentication_required = true; */
net->a5_encryption_mask = (1 << 1);
@@ -469,14 +471,15 @@
EXPECT_CONN_COUNT(0);
clear_vlr();
- comment_end(nr, imsi);
+ comment_end();
}
-void test_ciph_imei(uint8_t nr, const char *imsi)
+void test_ciph_imei()
{
struct vlr_subscr *vsub;
+ const char *imsi = "901700000004620";
- comment_start(nr, imsi);
+ comment_start();
/* implicit: net->authentication_required = true; */
net->a5_encryption_mask = (1 << 1);
@@ -570,14 +573,15 @@
EXPECT_CONN_COUNT(0);
clear_vlr();
- comment_end(nr, imsi);
+ comment_end();
}
-void test_ciph_imeisv(uint8_t nr, const char *imsi)
+void test_ciph_imeisv()
{
struct vlr_subscr *vsub;
+ const char *imsi = "901700000004620";
- comment_start(nr, imsi);
+ comment_start();
/* implicit: net->authentication_required = true; */
net->a5_encryption_mask = (1 << 1);
@@ -667,14 +671,15 @@
EXPECT_CONN_COUNT(0);
clear_vlr();
- comment_end(nr, imsi);
+ comment_end();
}
-void test_ciph_tmsi_imei(uint8_t nr, const char *imsi)
+void test_ciph_tmsi_imei()
{
struct vlr_subscr *vsub;
+ const char *imsi = "901700000004620";
- comment_start(nr, imsi);
+ comment_start();
/* implicit: net->authentication_required = true; */
net->a5_encryption_mask = (1 << 1);
@@ -786,12 +791,12 @@
EXPECT_CONN_COUNT(0);
clear_vlr();
- comment_end(nr, imsi);
+ comment_end();
}
-void test_lu_unknown_tmsi(uint8_t nr, const char *imsi)
+void test_lu_unknown_tmsi()
{
- comment_start(nr, imsi);
+ comment_start();
btw("Location Update request with unknown TMSI sends ID Request for IMSI");
lu_result_sent = RES_NONE;
@@ -827,7 +832,7 @@
VERBOSE_ASSERT(lu_result_sent, == RES_ACCEPT, "%d");
EXPECT_CONN_COUNT(0);
clear_vlr();
- comment_end(nr, imsi);
+ comment_end();
}
msc_vlr_test_func_t msc_vlr_tests[] = {